The word is that nitrogen trifluoride is more of a problem than previously thought, and it's used to manufacture all kinds of high-tech equipment, including thin-film solar panels.
- 15 days
Last month, while everyone was still coming down from presidential election frenzy and ramping up for Greenbuild, Building Design + Construction offered up another distraction: their annual white paper on the State of Green Building. This is the sixth in an annual series that was initially inspired by the success of Greenbuild 2002. While reports from the early years included remarks on the chances for the green building movement to keep rolling, the editors get a little more definitive this time around, starting on page four: "...no matter where you stand personally on the social, economic, political, or environmental issues related to climate change, you will soon have no choice but to factor it into your professional work."
A Decree: Factor It In
More than a rallying cry: this is a decree. Not that it’s breaking news –- but the editors at Building Design + Construction were taking a step beyond echoing the observation that the green building movement is on its way to mainstream. They were attempting to motivate their readers.
The white paper, entitled "Green Buildings + Climate Change," embraces a much more outward facing agenda than past years’ reports, which always focused on analyzing the green building movement itself (topics included Life Cycle Assessment and Green Buildings and the Bottom Line). This year’s table of contents reads like a What’s What in Sustainability, with reporting on major national, regional, state, and local climate change initiatives, current possibilities for a cap and trade system, and a discussion of the prominent studies and suggested mitigation strategies that have jarred the environmental movement in recent years.
A Matter of Degrees
To introduce all of this, the editors dedicated Chapter One to a cliff notes version of the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4, 2007), put out by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change –- "...the most scientifically valid and politically unbiased resource on climate change available." AR4 removes reasonable doubt that human activity warms the planet, and shows us that all those scary numbers, percentages, and estimated future degrees Celsius are ... getting scarier.
This information is carefully tied into green buildings, the crucial role the built environment could play in mitigating climate change (approximately 40% of the nation’s energy is sucked into buildings), and the fact that the AEC industry has hardly begun to wield its power. To quote, "only a small percent of new commercial buildings, and an even smaller percentage of new homes, gets any kind of green treatment ... the situation is even more distressing when it comes to existing buildings, which represent about 98% of the square footage in place in any one year." It would be nice to have some firmer numbers on the rate with which market transformation isn’t happening, but the idea is pretty clear. Green Buildings + Climate Change pounds out the message: We have a problem here and, building industry folks, you’ve got to start helping to fix it.
22 Suggestions to Green
Readers are left with a comprehensive, well-thought out list of 22 suggestions for AEC professionals to green their practices. There is also a section dedicated to the virtues of building commissioning, which is demonstrated to pay for itself many times over in umpteen studies, but just hasn’t caught hold yet: “Only about 1% of buildings are commissioned,” says the U.S. Department of Energy. The authors aren’t preaching to the choir. Greening isn’t happening on a large scale yet because the building industry (the audience for this white paper) isn’t making it happen, isn’t convincing clients.
Although BD+C’s climate change survey of 900+ AEC professionals showed that 95% of respondents said they had acted to "address climate change in their personal lives," there was a “vocal” contingent of skeptics (again, unfortunately, we didn’t get numbers on this). Says a project manager in Tennessee: “The so-called environmental movement is not based on sound principles, but as a means to redistribute wealth and move our civilization backwards.” So, it’s not just inertia or the perceived expense that’s holding green building back. A lack of personal motivation is another serious hurdle that needs to be overcome. Green Buildings + Climate Change puts forth a good effort on addressing that situation.
White Paper Download
[+] Green Buildings + Climate Change [PDF, Download w/ free registration]

Last month, while everyone was still coming down from presidential election frenzy and ramping up for Greenbuild, Building Design + Construction offered up another distraction: their annual white paper on the State of Green Building. This is the sixth in an annual series that was initially inspired by the success of Greenbuild 2002. While reports from the early years included remarks on the chances for the green building movement to keep rolling, the editors get a little more definitive this time around, starting on page four: "...no matter where you stand personally on the social, economic, political, or environmental issues related to climate change, you will soon have no choice but to factor it into your professional work."
A Decree: Factor It In
More than a rallying cry: this is a decree. Not that it’s breaking news –- but the editors at Building Design + Construction were taking a step beyond echoing the observation that the green building movement is on its way to mainstream. They were attempting to motivate their readers.
The white paper, entitled "Green Buildings + Climate Change," embraces a much more outward facing agenda than past years’ reports, which always focused on analyzing the green building movement itself (topics included Life Cycle Assessment and Green Buildings and the Bottom Line). This year’s table of contents reads like a What’s What in Sustainability, with reporting on major national, regional, state, and local climate change initiatives, current possibilities for a cap and trade system, and a discussion of the prominent studies and suggested mitigation strategies that have jarred the environmental movement in recent years.
A Matter of Degrees
To introduce all of this, the editors dedicated Chapter One to a cliff notes version of the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4, 2007), put out by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change –- "...the most scientifically valid and politically unbiased resource on climate change available." AR4 removes reasonable doubt that human activity warms the planet, and shows us that all those scary numbers, percentages, and estimated future degrees Celsius are ... getting scarier.
This information is carefully tied into green buildings, the crucial role the built environment could play in mitigating climate change (approximately 40% of the nation’s energy is sucked into buildings), and the fact that the AEC industry has hardly begun to wield its power. To quote, "only a small percent of new commercial buildings, and an even smaller percentage of new homes, gets any kind of green treatment ... the situation is even more distressing when it comes to existing buildings, which represent about 98% of the square footage in place in any one year." It would be nice to have some firmer numbers on the rate with which market transformation isn’t happening, but the idea is pretty clear. Green Buildings + Climate Change pounds out the message: We have a problem here and, building industry folks, you’ve got to start helping to fix it.
22 Suggestions to Green
Readers are left with a comprehensive, well-thought out list of 22 suggestions for AEC professionals to green their practices. There is also a section dedicated to the virtues of building commissioning, which is demonstrated to pay for itself many times over in umpteen studies, but just hasn’t caught hold yet: “Only about 1% of buildings are commissioned,” says the U.S. Department of Energy. The authors aren’t preaching to the choir. Greening isn’t happening on a large scale yet because the building industry (the audience for this white paper) isn’t making it happen, isn’t convincing clients.
Although BD+C’s climate change survey of 900+ AEC professionals showed that 95% of respondents said they had acted to "address climate change in their personal lives," there was a “vocal” contingent of skeptics (again, unfortunately, we didn’t get numbers on this). Says a project manager in Tennessee: “The so-called environmental movement is not based on sound principles, but as a means to redistribute wealth and move our civilization backwards.” So, it’s not just inertia or the perceived expense that’s holding green building back. A lack of personal motivation is another serious hurdle that needs to be overcome. Green Buildings + Climate Change puts forth a good effort on addressing that situation.
White Paper Download
[+] Green Buildings + Climate Change [PDF, Download w/ free registration]
Thanks to constant 2008 election coverage, many Americans missed important news stories this fall. ForeignPolicy.com came up with a list of 10 articles people may have missed, one of which found that one type of solar panels might actually be harmful to the environment.
A research study by Scripps Institute of Oceanography based out of the University of California, San Diego was the first to measure the amount of nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) in the Earth’s atmosphere. NF3 is used for cleaning microcircuits in flat-screen televisions, iPhones and thin-film solar panels.
NF3 is a gas 17,000 times worse for the environment than carbon dioxide (CO2) in causing global warming, and it stays in the atmosphere about five times longer. But NF3 was thought to be a better alternative to CO2 because, according to industry estimates, only 2 percent of NF3 ever makes it to the atmosphere. This encouraged companies to use NF3, as did the fact that it wasn’t considered dangerous enough to be covered by the Kyoto Protocol — the 1997 agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions signed by more than 150 countries.
The study, funded by NASA, was the first to test the amount of NF3 in the atmosphere, and it found that it is more prominent than previously thought. It had been estimated that less than 1,200 metric tons of NF3 was in the atmosphere in 2006. The new research by Scripps shows the actual amount was 4,200 metric tons. In 2008, about 5,400 metric tons of the gas was in the atmosphere, a quantity that has increased at a rate of 11 percent a year.
“This is a significantly higher percentage than has been estimated by industry, and thus strengthens the case for inventorying NF3 production and for regulating its emissions,” the published research said.
But not all solar panels are made with NF3; the problem only applies to thin-film solar panels. According to the Energy Information Administration, in 2006 thin-film solar panel represented 30 percent of photovoltaic cells made by the U.S. solar industry.
However, thin-film solar panels have recently gained popularity though because they are generally cheaper to produce.
It looks like we need to take another look at the manufacturing process for thin-film solar since it isn’t quite perfect, darn it.
- 15 days
Located in a formerly desolate area of downtown St. Louis, the William A. Kerr Foundation building is a showcase for sustainable renovation strategies. It started out in the late 1800's as a bathhouse (it sits above a natural mineral spring), and thereafter as a paint warehouse -- over time, it fell into disrepair. The neighborhood was blighted when it was acquired by the owners, and they wanted to restore the building for the foundation's offices and educational activities. Subsequent to remediation and renovation, it was awarded 58 out of a possible 69 points by the USGBC and received LEED Platinum certification. The William A. Kerr Foundation building has the following green features:
According to Vertegy, a full-service sustainable consultancy, the 4,800 square foot building was renovated at a cost of $1.5 million. In addition, last May, ED+C published a case study of the building and described the building's unique restoration.



Image credits: Trailnet (top); Urban Review STL (bottom three).

Located in a formerly desolate area of downtown St. Louis, the William A. Kerr Foundation building is a showcase for sustainable renovation strategies. It started out in the late 1800's as a bathhouse (it sits above a natural mineral spring), and thereafter as a paint warehouse -- over time, it fell into disrepair. The neighborhood was blighted when it was acquired by the owners, and they wanted to restore the building for the foundation's offices and educational activities. Subsequent to remediation and renovation, it was awarded 58 out of a possible 69 points by the USGBC and received LEED Platinum certification. The William A. Kerr Foundation building has the following green features:
According to Vertegy, a full-service sustainable consultancy, the 4,800 square foot building was renovated at a cost of $1.5 million. In addition, last May, ED+C published a case study of the building and described the building's unique restoration.



Image credits: Trailnet (top); Urban Review STL (bottom three).

Blogs worth reading: Green Building Law Update + Bright Green Blog.
The clean marine energy sector is to benefit from the expertise of the carbon intensive aviation and oil industries in a bid to cut the cost of generating electricity from the seas.
- 18 daysWork should commence immediately to ensure that renewable electricity generated offshore is transmitted to the National Grid, according to a new report.
- 18 days
Emily Kroll, CEO and founder of upholstered furniture company EKLA HOME, has furniture design and environmentalism in her blood. The granddaughter of a furniture designer on one side, and an architectural and scrap metal recycler on the other, Kroll says she is "passionate about changing the way the furniture business works in the United States." She plans to do this by eliminating toxins, limiting waste and using sustainable materials. And EKLA certainly has a very impressive list of sustainable practices, perhaps one of the most impressive on the green furniture market today.
ELKA is a member of the Organic Trade Association, Sustainable Furniture Council, and Co-Op America. They have third-party certifications by FSC, Oeko-tex, KRAV, SCS Gold, and GREENGUARD. Their practices include using raw materials sourced as close to manufacturing facility as possible, producing all products in the U.S., and using only organic and non-toxic materials and the lowest VOC finishes possible. EKLA also uses reclaimed wood whenever possible and, otherwise, the wood is FSC Alder, a sustainable crop.
Other small details are paid attention as well such as recycling packing materials and operating the workshop on as much natural light as possible. One aspect that I particularly like is that no chemical flame-retardants are used, which can be highly toxic and are found on products ranging from pillows to children's pajamas.
Their website is currently only displaying five style options at this time, but the pieces are modern and attractive, especially the Camille, Kristina, and Milano (pictured in this article). I have listed the specific eco-elements of some pieces below the photo. EKLA is certainly making an outstanding effort to create green furniture. A sentence on EKLA's website states their goals beautifully : "Our devotion to craftsmanship and quality produces pieces that last a lifetime, and are lush and luxurious but never compromise our dedication to the environment." Visit their website for more information.

MILANO SOFA ROUGE - 100% organic wool, dyed with fiber reactive low impact, non-toxic dye. Construction: Natural Rubber, 100% organic US grown and milled wool, 100% organic cotton barrier cloth, FSC alder frame and legs, recycled steel springs, Safecoat no VOC stain.

KRISTINA SECTIONAL CITRUS - 100% organic wool, dyed with fiber reactive low impact, non-toxic dye. Construction: Natural Rubber, 100% organic US grown and milled wool, 100% organic cotton barrier cloth, FSC alder frame and legs, recycled steel springs, Safecoat no VOC stain.

Image credits: Elka Home.

Last month, Heyday Partnership began construction on a slick small lot development called Rock Row. Located in the Eagle Rock area, which is north of downtown LA, Rock Row will feature town home-esque (no party wall) properties at affordable-ish ($475k-$550k) prices. Believe it or not -- those of you outside of New York and California, Rock Row is considered one of the first, reasonably-priced, green housing projects in Los Angeles. The development team includes an architect, developer, and builder working in collaboration, so Heyday is able to pass on affordability to future home buyers.
Rock Row was designed and will be built for certification under the LEED for Homes program. No doubt, it'll be in the lighter green realm as compared to some developments we've focused on, but some green features incorporated into the development include a water permeable grass pave system for the driveway; tankless water heaters and low-flow fixtures for water conservation; flooring of strand woven bamboo; green roofs and water efficient, drought tolerant landscaping; and pre-wiring for a rooftop solar array.
When complete, Rock Row will have 15 modern homes ranging from a two-story 2/2 at 1300 square feet to a three-story 3/3 at 1540 square feet. These sizes are just right actually, what with the national average loafing around at 2400 square feet or so. So it's probably safe to say that Rock Row will be the perfect place for green leaning professionals looking for a modern, green pad with a small footprint. Can't wait to see the finished development ...



Rendering credits: Heyday.
Landfill gas is to be harnessed to generate gas that will power the equivalent of 6,000 homes in Belfast.
- 19 days